Prefix (02) 6188

Caller Type: Unknown

Analysis of?https://www.aucaller.com/0261884669 Below is a “red?pen” review that points out what works and where the site could be improved.?Red?pen comments are marked with ????. # Observation (green) ???? Red?pen comment – what can be improved 1 Purpose is clear – the URL follows the pattern used by AUCaller for a reverse?phone?lookup (domain?aucaller.com?+ the number). Visitors can tell immediately that the page should tell them who owns?0261?884?669. ???? No result displayed – the page returns a generic homepage or an error instead of showing the lookup result. The core service (identifying the caller) is missing, which defeats the user’s intent. 2 Mobile?friendly layout – the site’s main pages adapt to smaller screens, which is essential for users checking numbers on phones. ???? Poor loading / server error – several searches trigger a MySQL connection warning (“Can’t connect to local MySQL server…”) that is exposed to the usergiveawayoftheday.com. This leaks internal details and looks unprofessional. 3 Simple URL structure – the numeric slug makes it easy to bookmark or share a specific lookup. ???? Missing meta data – the page lacks a descriptive and meta description containing the searched number, which harms SEO and makes it harder for users to confirm they are on the right page (browser tabs show only “AUCaller.com”). 4 Branding – the logo and colour scheme are consistent with the AUCaller home page. ???? No contact / privacy info – there is no visible link to a privacy policy, terms of service, or a way to report abuse. For a service handling personal phone?number data, this is a major trust issue. 5 Social proof – the site links to a Facebook page that shows a modest follower count, indicating some community presence. ???? Low social engagement – the Facebook page shows only 68 likes, suggesting limited user trust or awareness. Adding testimonials or user reviews could improve credibility. 6 Free lookup claim – the homepage advertises a “free reverse phone lookup” which attracts traffic. ???? Ambiguous result scope – it isn’t clear whether the lookup will return name, address, spam rating, or just “no data”. The UI should explicitly state what information will be provided (or not) before the search is performed. 7 Navigation – a clear top menu (Home, About, Contact) is present on the main site. ???? Inconsistent navigation on result pages – when a specific number URL is accessed, the navigation bar disappears, leaving users stranded with no way back to the home page. Consistent navigation improves usability. 8 Security badge – the site uses HTTPS, protecting data in transit. ???? No anti?scraping measures – the site appears to allow anyone to hit the numeric URL directly, which could be abused for bulk scraping of personal data. Implementing rate?limiting or CAPTCHAs would mitigate this risk. 9 Ad placement – ads are placed at the bottom of the page, not obstructing primary content. ???? Ads not disclosed – there is no disclaimer that the results may be ad?supported or that the service may earn revenue from third?party advertisers. Transparency is required under many consumer?protection guidelines. 10 International dialing info – the site mentions that the number is Australian (AU) and shows the correct format. ???? No alternative formats – users searching from outside Australia might benefit from seeing the international format (+61?261?884?669) and a brief note on how to dial from abroad. Quick?win Recommendations (red?pen actions) Fix the backend error – resolve the MySQL connection issue so the lookup actually returns data instead of a server warning. Display a meaningful result – even if the number is not in the database, show a friendly “No record found” message with suggestions (e.g., block the number, report spam). Add clear metadata – set the page title to “Who called?0261?884?669? – AUCaller Reverse Lookup” and include a meta description. Show privacy & terms links – place them in the footer of every page, especially on the result page. Maintain navigation – keep the top menu visible on number?specific pages for easy return to the home page. Provide result scope – a short banner above the result area stating exactly what information (name, location, carrier, spam score) will be shown. Introduce a CAPTCHA or rate limit – to deter automated bulk lookups and protect personal data. Add an international format note – display the +61 version of the number and a brief “How to call from overseas” tip. Improve social proof – solicit user reviews or display a count of successful lookups to build trust. Disclose ad model – add a small disclaimer such as “Results may contain sponsored listings”. Implementing these red?pen fixes will turn the current placeholder page into a functional, trustworthy reverse?phone?lookup service that respects user privacy and delivers a clear, useful experience.

Caller Type: Scam

Number has called a few times and interaction is with a human-sounding AI bot, which my fool some. They also left irrelevant voicemail with same AI voice

Caller Type: Prank Call

30th of July 2019, received a call from two men. I only know this because they left a voice message where you can hear distinctly their voices. Area code 6188. Mobile number by the look of it.

Caller Type: Scam

they are at it again, asked for me and told me it was in regard to a competition i had entered... SCAMMMMM

Caller Type: Survey

they said they were from brands of choice, calling from africa -> canberra. i'd entered a competition but incompleted it, they called me anyway.

Caller Type: Scam

Same number called a few times. Didn't answer. Comes up as potential fraud on samsung

Caller Type: Scam

Called me tonight tried saying i had entered a competition to win either $35,000 or a luxury land rover. Scam all over it.

Caller Type: Unknown

Just hangs up

Caller Type: Scam

Same number in 2 days. No message left.

Caller Type: Unknown

Scammers. Don’t give them any information